TRANSFORM YOUR TEAM'S SEASON WITH PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED SESSIONS
Use our expert plans or build your own using our library of over 700+ drills, and easy-to-use tools.
JOIN NOW
Why do teams risk losing the ball at the line out or scrum when awarded a penalty close to the opposition try line. Could they not set up a driving maul directly from the penalty?ThanksAde Collingham
Hi Ade, there are no laws against trying to do that. A `maul` is not technically formed until both teams are involved. From a penalty, an opposition defender could still make a `tackle`, whereas collapsing a maul is illegal. Moreover, without a maul technically formed there would be no offside line and a defender could just go around to the back and disrupt the ball. However, from 5m out it would seem pretty unstoppable. Maybe give it a try and see what happens! I would be interested to see what the ref does. I think professional teams can rely on their lineouts so it is easier to set up a maul from there.
Check out the World Rugby Laws: https://laws.worldrugby.org/?law=16&language=EN
in more ways than one
From France's collision dominance to England's folding defence - what grassroots coaches can learn from the 2026 Six Nations.
The removal of "not-straight" on uncontested lineouts transforms your set-piece options. Here's how to exploit the new rule.
2026 brings revolutionary changes to international rugby: a brand new global tournament, historic tours, and law changes that will reshape the game. Here's everything coaches need to know.
Use our expert plans or build your own using our library of over 700+ drills, and easy-to-use tools.
JOIN NOW