TRANSFORM YOUR TEAM'S SEASON WITH PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED SESSIONS
Use our expert plans or build your own using our library of over 700+ drills, and easy-to-use tools.
JOIN NOW
Why donât teams set up a driving maul directly from a penalty, rather than risk losing a scrum or line out?
Hello Ade,
It has been shown in international test matches and premiership matches statistics that the scoring rate from Penalty Line-outs and scrums are significantly higher then from a "tap" and go penalty forming a maul.
By law a maul includes two attackers including the ball carrier and a player of the defending team. Meaning that a player would have to "risk" losing the ball in a maul from a tap and go penalty. However, if they set up a driving maul from a set piece the likeliness of ball retention and scoring is significantly higher as the ball is protected by more then two players.
in more ways than one
From France's collision dominance to England's folding defence - what grassroots coaches can learn from the 2026 Six Nations.
The removal of "not-straight" on uncontested lineouts transforms your set-piece options. Here's how to exploit the new rule.
2026 brings revolutionary changes to international rugby: a brand new global tournament, historic tours, and law changes that will reshape the game. Here's everything coaches need to know.
Use our expert plans or build your own using our library of over 700+ drills, and easy-to-use tools.
JOIN NOW