Field Hockey: attacking formations

Connection-Based Coaching has emerged as a significant movement in hockey coaching. The core idea is simple but powerful: the relationship between coach and player is the foundation upon which all development is built. Without trust, without genuine connection, coaching effectiveness is limited.

This isn't soft philosophy. Research consistently shows that athletes who feel psychologically safe, who trust their coach, who believe their coach genuinely cares about them, perform better and develop faster.

What is Psychological Safety?

Psychological safety is the belief that you can take risks without being punished or humiliated. In a hockey context, it means players who feel safe to:

  • Try new skills without fear of criticism for failure
  • Ask questions without being made to feel stupid
  • Offer ideas without being dismissed
  • Make mistakes in matches without losing their place
  • Express concerns without negative consequences

When psychological safety exists, players are more creative, more willing to stretch themselves, and more honest about their development needs.

Building Connection

Know Your Players

Do you know what motivates each player? Their life outside hockey? Their hopes and concerns? Connection requires knowledge, and knowledge requires investment in getting to know people.

This doesn't mean becoming best friends. It means showing genuine interest, remembering what players tell you, and demonstrating that you see them as people, not just performers.

Listen More Than You Speak

Many coaches do too much telling. Connection-based coaching emphasises listening. When players speak, give them full attention. Ask follow-up questions. Reflect back what you've heard to show understanding.

Listening builds trust because it demonstrates respect. When players feel heard, they're more receptive to coaching.

Consistency and Reliability

Trust is built through consistent behaviour over time. If you say you'll do something, do it. If you have standards, apply them equally to everyone. Inconsistency destroys trust faster than almost anything else.

Appropriate Vulnerability

Coaches who admit mistakes, acknowledge what they don't know, and share their own development journey build stronger connections than those who project infallibility. Appropriate vulnerability models the openness you want from players.

Connection in Practice

Individual Check-Ins

Brief one-to-one conversations build connection over time. Not always about hockey - sometimes just "How are you?" delivered with genuine interest. These small interactions accumulate into strong relationships.

Personalised Feedback

Generic feedback shows you're not paying attention. Specific, personalised feedback shows you see the individual. "Good work" is less powerful than "I noticed you recovered really quickly after that turnover - that's the response we need."

Celebrating Progress

Connection-based coaches celebrate development, not just outcomes. The player who improves from poor to average has achieved as much as the player who was always excellent. Recognition should reflect effort and progress.

Managing Difficult Conversations

Strong connections make difficult conversations possible. When players trust you, they can hear hard truths. When they don't, the same truths are rejected as unfair criticism. Build the connection first; the honest feedback can follow.

Team-Level Application

Connection isn't just coach-to-player. Teams with strong player-to-player connections perform better. The coach's role includes creating conditions for these connections:

  • Team-building activities that build genuine relationships
  • Training structures that encourage collaboration
  • Addressing behaviours that damage team connection
  • Celebrating collective achievements

Common Barriers

"I don't have time": Connection doesn't require separate time - it's embedded in how you do everything. A two-minute conversation while setting up equipment still counts.

"It's soft": The evidence says otherwise. High-performance environments increasingly recognise that connection underpins performance, not detracts from it.

"Not all players want it": Different players need different levels and types of connection. Read what each individual needs and adjust accordingly.

Key Coaching Points

  • Psychological safety enables risk-taking and growth
  • Know your players as people, not just performers
  • Listen more, tell less
  • Be consistent and reliable
  • Personalise your interactions and feedback
  • Create conditions for player-to-player connection

Drills That Build Team Connection

VIEW ALL SMALL-SIDED GAMES

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans
attacking formations DRILLS
View All
Unfortunately there were no results for your search! Please try again
attacking formations ANSWERS
View All

What is a good attacking formation?

What is a good attacking formation?

Archived User Coach

Alternate / complementary formation suggestions to 4-3-3?

Hi, last season after asking here, we played the 4-3-3 formation. We took the field in this formation and played the whole game this way. This worked really well for us last season, we got promoted and finished 3rd in our new grade. However we came unstuck in the semi finals where the team we were playing identified what we were doing and played the same formation against us in the second half, leaving us unable to make any inroads for the remainder of the game.Our team is from a small school, made up of year 7-13 boys playing against larger schools of year 9-13 boys, though i would guess we played against teams at the older end of the range. We can't match others teams in age & size or depth of experience yet, so we must play smarter.What are possible alternative formations and how would the team identify the need to switch between formations?David Smith

David Smith Coach, New Zealand

7 sides hockey

What is the best formation and game play for 7 sides tournament in defending and attacking?

Ameer Shazwan Coach, Malaysia

protecting inexperienced keeper

Playing adult mens at a low league level, mixture of ageing experienced players, inexperienced young and not so young players.We normally play 343 diamond, with mixed results, when I works it works well.We are without our keeper , so an outfield player (me , not so young, not so good) padding up.Really need a formation that is going to discourage pressure on the last line of defence (this section has the best, older experienced players).Bit vague and difficult to answer, I would think but a pointer would be good. Many thanks

Jimmy Harwood Coach, England

advantages of playing 3-2-1 when playing 6 a side without a goalie

advantages of playing 3-2-1 when playing 6 a side without a goalie

Coach, United Kingdom

6 a side without a goalie formation

Would you say switching it around to a 1-2-3 would make for better attacking formations?

Coach, United Kingdom

7 sides hockey | Sportplan

What is the best formation and game play for 7 sides tournament in defending and attacking?

Ameer Shazwan Coach, Malaysia

advantages of playing 3-2-1 wh...

advantages of playing 3-2-1 when playing 6 a side without a goalie

Coach, United Kingdom

Midfield positioning on 16yd h...

hi there I'm using 4-4-2 and on sometimes 3-1-4-2 with a lower level hockey team.I've chosen this over other formations, simply because the hockey experience and ability of my players is not of a high level (and most people have an approximate understanding of 442). Also, I believe that one must choose a formation based on players traits and what they can deliver. For example, I'd ideally prefer to have 3 forwards, to help with more height and width but then would have to either play 3 in the middle or 3 at the back... and my player strengths don't permit this. In short, I simply don't believe I have a strong enough CH / CM to handle 3 in the middle and I'm not convinced that the off-the-ball support from other players is strong enough to allow 3 in the middle. OFFENSIVE PLAYS Anyway, I'm not 100% where to get my centre mids to stand when we have a 16 yd hit to take (i.e. our possession). Obviously one of the CMs comes deep to offer a potential direct outlet from the centre backs or offer an overload option if the ball goes out to the sides (which is more likely, since I've pretty much banned the high risk play of releasing up the middle - we've had far too many turnovers in our final third or quarter because we tried to play up the middle). My players are 'aware' of posting up and leading runs. However, I'm not sure about the 2nd CM. On the one hand I'd ideally like the 2nd CM to come deep as well, in order to potentially help break up the opposition press but by doing so, I distort the midfield and if we do manage to get the ball to one of the CMs, he won't have the 2nd CM in a higher position to release to, etc. DEFENSIVE POSITIONING Can someone suggest, again, about midfield positioning using 4-4-2 or 3-1-4-2, when we are setting up a general press? I have traditionally encouraged man marking, simply because our general positional awareness is weak (which makes zonal play a no-no IMO) + our tracking and attitude to committed defending (i.e. you don’t give up if one tackle fails) could be better! However, looking at suggested presses on Sportplan, some zonal positioning seems a necessity and I think if I can help my players make the step, success will come because they've been forced to become more aware of their pitch positioning, etc. Also, looking at some of the presses, it looks like the midfield can go 'flat' to create a barrier... and as I encourage a diamond shape in midfield, I need to explain to my players what to do and when. Sorry for the wordy question. I hope this all makes sense. Regards, Gary

Gary Thompson Coach, England

2323 formation can it work? | ...

2323 formation can it work?

Archived User Coach

What position should I play my...

Hi Im new to coaching hockey want to know what position do I play some of my weaker players without them losing interest and there confidence.

Archived User Coach

Best way to teach shape and po...

hi allI'm currently coaching 12 and 13 yr olds and the team has a massive problem with shape and being disciplined positionally.Any tips, ideas, drills etc for helping with / teaching this?many thanks,Gary

Gary Thompson Coach, England

How do you keep your team moti...

we started the season 5-1 and now mid-way it seems we are fading? we have lost our last 3 games - what are some good drills to get them focused again and pumped for the rest of the season and to get them over the hump -to the next level. thanks

Brenda Strohmer Coach, United States of America

2:4:4:1system....how to play i...

Suggestions on how to play this system. I have very young 1st team so feel i must play defensive hockey. Thanks

Bev Koch Coach, South Africa

Looking for a 6-a good side ho...

I am looking for 6 a side hockey formations. We have been playing 3-1-1-1. Worked very well, however sweeper was so good, goalie never touched the ball. I want to move sweeper to goalie/ sweeper but our mid field player is too good to just play right. What to do? 2-2-1-1 or 1-3-1-1?     

Archived User Coach

Playing 1,2,3,5 formation - co...

I am coaching 1,2,3,5 formation in an U16 Girls team but I am having trouble getting my Halfbacks connecting with my Inside Forwards - Any suggestions

Glenn Hutchinson Coach, Australia

Counter Attacking | Sportplan

Have any other coaches got tips, advice or drill ideas on how i can improve my team's ability to counter attack?

Jack Grundy Coach, England

Question about playing 3-3-3-1...

Can you please assist me, I am coaching the 1st school team (0/18). we are playing 3-3-3-1 but there is a big gap between the forwards and links and also between the links and the backs. How can I change that. Is there any excercises that I can do with them or must we rather change the system??

Mariana Lotz Coach, South Africa

Formation at tactics for playi...

I'm new to coaching, I have played at a high level for over 10 years. The team I'm coaching often has no goalie but has enough players. Looking for the best formation to play a full game with no goalie, we usually play a 3-4-3.

Craig LAwrence Coach, Canada

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans

Sportplan App

Give it a try - it's better in the app

YOUR SESSION IS STARTING SOON... Join the worlds largest netball coaching resource for 700+ drills and pro tools to make coaching easy.
LET'S DO IT