Field Hockey: sweeper

Connection-Based Coaching has emerged as a significant movement in hockey coaching. The core idea is simple but powerful: the relationship between coach and player is the foundation upon which all development is built. Without trust, without genuine connection, coaching effectiveness is limited.

This isn't soft philosophy. Research consistently shows that athletes who feel psychologically safe, who trust their coach, who believe their coach genuinely cares about them, perform better and develop faster.

What is Psychological Safety?

Psychological safety is the belief that you can take risks without being punished or humiliated. In a hockey context, it means players who feel safe to:

  • Try new skills without fear of criticism for failure
  • Ask questions without being made to feel stupid
  • Offer ideas without being dismissed
  • Make mistakes in matches without losing their place
  • Express concerns without negative consequences

When psychological safety exists, players are more creative, more willing to stretch themselves, and more honest about their development needs.

Building Connection

Know Your Players

Do you know what motivates each player? Their life outside hockey? Their hopes and concerns? Connection requires knowledge, and knowledge requires investment in getting to know people.

This doesn't mean becoming best friends. It means showing genuine interest, remembering what players tell you, and demonstrating that you see them as people, not just performers.

Listen More Than You Speak

Many coaches do too much telling. Connection-based coaching emphasises listening. When players speak, give them full attention. Ask follow-up questions. Reflect back what you've heard to show understanding.

Listening builds trust because it demonstrates respect. When players feel heard, they're more receptive to coaching.

Consistency and Reliability

Trust is built through consistent behaviour over time. If you say you'll do something, do it. If you have standards, apply them equally to everyone. Inconsistency destroys trust faster than almost anything else.

Appropriate Vulnerability

Coaches who admit mistakes, acknowledge what they don't know, and share their own development journey build stronger connections than those who project infallibility. Appropriate vulnerability models the openness you want from players.

Connection in Practice

Individual Check-Ins

Brief one-to-one conversations build connection over time. Not always about hockey - sometimes just "How are you?" delivered with genuine interest. These small interactions accumulate into strong relationships.

Personalised Feedback

Generic feedback shows you're not paying attention. Specific, personalised feedback shows you see the individual. "Good work" is less powerful than "I noticed you recovered really quickly after that turnover - that's the response we need."

Celebrating Progress

Connection-based coaches celebrate development, not just outcomes. The player who improves from poor to average has achieved as much as the player who was always excellent. Recognition should reflect effort and progress.

Managing Difficult Conversations

Strong connections make difficult conversations possible. When players trust you, they can hear hard truths. When they don't, the same truths are rejected as unfair criticism. Build the connection first; the honest feedback can follow.

Team-Level Application

Connection isn't just coach-to-player. Teams with strong player-to-player connections perform better. The coach's role includes creating conditions for these connections:

  • Team-building activities that build genuine relationships
  • Training structures that encourage collaboration
  • Addressing behaviours that damage team connection
  • Celebrating collective achievements

Common Barriers

"I don't have time": Connection doesn't require separate time - it's embedded in how you do everything. A two-minute conversation while setting up equipment still counts.

"It's soft": The evidence says otherwise. High-performance environments increasingly recognise that connection underpins performance, not detracts from it.

"Not all players want it": Different players need different levels and types of connection. Read what each individual needs and adjust accordingly.

Key Coaching Points

  • Psychological safety enables risk-taking and growth
  • Know your players as people, not just performers
  • Listen more, tell less
  • Be consistent and reliable
  • Personalise your interactions and feedback
  • Create conditions for player-to-player connection

Drills That Build Team Connection

VIEW ALL SMALL-SIDED GAMES

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans
sweeper DRILLS
View All
Unfortunately there were no results for your search! Please try again
sweeper ANSWERS
View All

How do you play against a team with a Star Player?

Last season we played a couple of teams with a Star player in a key position who ran the game for their side. Any tips on how to stop this sort of team. Especially with many teams these days having a player/coach who is ex-national league this is happening more and more. We played 3 teams last season, 2 with a Star sweeper and another with a Star centre-half. How can we stop them playing and still play our game?

Sportplan Team Coach, United Kingdom

what are the best drills for defending the left channel?

I can find lots of defensive drills, but am not sure which would be best for defending the left channel.

Archived User Coach

What is your best advice to a boy playing sweeper in a team with a poor defense

My son has been given the role of sweeper in a team that has only won  twice in two years.  He is probably the weakest player in the team.  What advice can I give him to think about when playing, so that he can improve and enjoy a personal sense of achievement. In training sessions I have never seen any drills designed to organise the defence which is amazing since the teams ambition is usually to keep the goals against to single figures! Are there standard apporoaches as to how close to be  to the player you are marking or which side to stand to stop the attacker getting free with the ball on his open stick?.

Archived User Coach

Presses

Would anybody like to give me a diagram of 3/4 press and half court please ?

Simon Lowry Coach, Ireland

Looking for a 6-a good side hockey formation?

I am looking for 6 a side hockey formations. We have been playing 3-1-1-1. Worked very well, however sweeper was so good, goalie never touched the ball. I want to move sweeper to goalie/ sweeper but our mid field player is too good to just play right. What to do? 2-2-1-1 or 1-3-1-1?     

Archived User Coach

Looking for information on 1442 and 11333 systems...

information on 1442 and 11333 systems. I am fairly new to sportplan so hopefully someone can point me in the right direction. I am from Australia so know the GK-2-3-5 set up well. I would like to possibly employ a GK-4-4-2 / GK -1-3-4-2 set up or a GK-1-3-3-3. What I need is information on How players are set up, Forward press set ups, defencive zone set ups and attacking methods. For a bonus it would be great to know how they set up against a GK-2-3-5 as most of our oposition teams play this or a gk-2-3-3-2 Cheers 

Keith Coach, Australia

Formation for 9-a-side full field tournament?

My girl's team is playing a 9 a side full field tournament. I'm thinking of a 3-4-1-keeper. I think the keeper neesd to stand high on the D and act as a sweeper. What are your thoughts?

Archived User Coach

Midfield positioning on 16yd hits and presses when using 4-4-2?

hi there I'm using 4-4-2 and on sometimes 3-1-4-2 with a lower level hockey team.I've chosen this over other formations, simply because the hockey experience and ability of my players is not of a high level (and most people have an approximate understanding of 442). Also, I believe that one must choose a formation based on players traits and what they can deliver. For example, I'd ideally prefer to have 3 forwards, to help with more height and width but then would have to either play 3 in the middle or 3 at the back... and my player strengths don't permit this. In short, I simply don't believe I have a strong enough CH / CM to handle 3 in the middle and I'm not convinced that the off-the-ball support from other players is strong enough to allow 3 in the middle. OFFENSIVE PLAYS Anyway, I'm not 100% where to get my centre mids to stand when we have a 16 yd hit to take (i.e. our possession). Obviously one of the CMs comes deep to offer a potential direct outlet from the centre backs or offer an overload option if the ball goes out to the sides (which is more likely, since I've pretty much banned the high risk play of releasing up the middle - we've had far too many turnovers in our final third or quarter because we tried to play up the middle). My players are 'aware' of posting up and leading runs. However, I'm not sure about the 2nd CM. On the one hand I'd ideally like the 2nd CM to come deep as well, in order to potentially help break up the opposition press but by doing so, I distort the midfield and if we do manage to get the ball to one of the CMs, he won't have the 2nd CM in a higher position to release to, etc. DEFENSIVE POSITIONING Can someone suggest, again, about midfield positioning using 4-4-2 or 3-1-4-2, when we are setting up a general press? I have traditionally encouraged man marking, simply because our general positional awareness is weak (which makes zonal play a no-no IMO) + our tracking and attitude to committed defending (i.e. you don’t give up if one tackle fails) could be better! However, looking at suggested presses on Sportplan, some zonal positioning seems a necessity and I think if I can help my players make the step, success will come because they've been forced to become more aware of their pitch positioning, etc. Also, looking at some of the presses, it looks like the midfield can go 'flat' to create a barrier... and as I encourage a diamond shape in midfield, I need to explain to my players what to do and when. Sorry for the wordy question. I hope this all makes sense. Regards, Gary

Gary Thompson Coach, England

How can we overcome a 1-4-4-2 formation?

I coach a women's team wide range in age 16 - 54 , when the stars align we are a very strong team hard to beat and very stingy when it comes to goals against, the games we do lose are usually 1-0 games,The exception comes when we play a team that plays a 1-4-4-2 ,what makes it worse is that we play a 4-4-2 and are very successful with it, but when it comes to defending against it my Defense and Mids become confused. I have not had any luck in figuring out a way to explain to my team how to defend against it. Any ideas on an easy way to fix this? Thanks

William Phillips Coach, Canada

Opposition playing with 2 Centre Halfs

Hi All,Just looking for a simple way to counteract teams playing with 2 Centre Halfs. Have had my Centre Forward try to mark the 2nd Centre Half with limited success I'm not sure if it is there Centre Mid who is playing in the position or one of the Insides as they seem to diengage when they go into attack. Any help appreciated.RegardsIan Manhire

Ian Manhire Coach, Australia

3-3-3-1 Formation drills

we have started using the 3-3-3-1 formation and wanted some drills to reinforce this formation

baulko Coach, Australia

drills for backpassing

Have a team of older group of ladies who need to learn to pass the ball back, any good drills for this?

trudy adamson Coach, New Zealand

2:4:4:1system....how to play it

Suggestions on how to play this system. I have very young 1st team so feel i must play defensive hockey. Thanks

Bev Koch Coach, South Africa

Question regarding Defence

I am the sweeper and i need tips on how to setup the "backs" to basically force them to use zonal marking. But the problem is they commit to easily, How do I solve this?

Kyle Coach, South Africa

How to deal with high hanging strikers?

How do I defend two High hanging strikers?

Karin Barnard Coach, South Africa

Formation at tactics for playing with no goalie

I'm new to coaching, I have played at a high level for over 10 years. The team I'm coaching often has no goalie but has enough players. Looking for the best formation to play a full game with no goalie, we usually play a 3-4-3.

Craig LAwrence Coach, Canada

To man mark or zone? | Sportpl...

My Girls team I coach get caught a lot between man marking and zonal marking in the 23 yard area and sometimes end up with half the team doing one and the rest the other. Suggestions on the ideal defensive set up inside the 23?

Archived User Coach

Looking for a 6-a good side ho...

I am looking for 6 a side hockey formations. We have been playing 3-1-1-1. Worked very well, however sweeper was so good, goalie never touched the ball. I want to move sweeper to goalie/ sweeper but our mid field player is too good to just play right. What to do? 2-2-1-1 or 1-3-1-1?     

Archived User Coach

Formation for 9-a-side full fi...

My girl's team is playing a 9 a side full field tournament. I'm thinking of a 3-4-1-keeper. I think the keeper neesd to stand high on the D and act as a sweeper. What are your thoughts?

Archived User Coach

Midfield positioning on 16yd h...

hi there I'm using 4-4-2 and on sometimes 3-1-4-2 with a lower level hockey team.I've chosen this over other formations, simply because the hockey experience and ability of my players is not of a high level (and most people have an approximate understanding of 442). Also, I believe that one must choose a formation based on players traits and what they can deliver. For example, I'd ideally prefer to have 3 forwards, to help with more height and width but then would have to either play 3 in the middle or 3 at the back... and my player strengths don't permit this. In short, I simply don't believe I have a strong enough CH / CM to handle 3 in the middle and I'm not convinced that the off-the-ball support from other players is strong enough to allow 3 in the middle. OFFENSIVE PLAYS Anyway, I'm not 100% where to get my centre mids to stand when we have a 16 yd hit to take (i.e. our possession). Obviously one of the CMs comes deep to offer a potential direct outlet from the centre backs or offer an overload option if the ball goes out to the sides (which is more likely, since I've pretty much banned the high risk play of releasing up the middle - we've had far too many turnovers in our final third or quarter because we tried to play up the middle). My players are 'aware' of posting up and leading runs. However, I'm not sure about the 2nd CM. On the one hand I'd ideally like the 2nd CM to come deep as well, in order to potentially help break up the opposition press but by doing so, I distort the midfield and if we do manage to get the ball to one of the CMs, he won't have the 2nd CM in a higher position to release to, etc. DEFENSIVE POSITIONING Can someone suggest, again, about midfield positioning using 4-4-2 or 3-1-4-2, when we are setting up a general press? I have traditionally encouraged man marking, simply because our general positional awareness is weak (which makes zonal play a no-no IMO) + our tracking and attitude to committed defending (i.e. you don’t give up if one tackle fails) could be better! However, looking at suggested presses on Sportplan, some zonal positioning seems a necessity and I think if I can help my players make the step, success will come because they've been forced to become more aware of their pitch positioning, etc. Also, looking at some of the presses, it looks like the midfield can go 'flat' to create a barrier... and as I encourage a diamond shape in midfield, I need to explain to my players what to do and when. Sorry for the wordy question. I hope this all makes sense. Regards, Gary

Gary Thompson Coach, England

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans

Sportplan App

Give it a try - it's better in the app

YOUR SESSION IS STARTING SOON... Join the worlds largest hockey coaching resource for 1000+ drills and pro tools to make coaching easy.
LET'S DO IT