Field Hockey: different presses

Connection-Based Coaching has emerged as a significant movement in hockey coaching. The core idea is simple but powerful: the relationship between coach and player is the foundation upon which all development is built. Without trust, without genuine connection, coaching effectiveness is limited.

This isn't soft philosophy. Research consistently shows that athletes who feel psychologically safe, who trust their coach, who believe their coach genuinely cares about them, perform better and develop faster.

What is Psychological Safety?

Psychological safety is the belief that you can take risks without being punished or humiliated. In a hockey context, it means players who feel safe to:

  • Try new skills without fear of criticism for failure
  • Ask questions without being made to feel stupid
  • Offer ideas without being dismissed
  • Make mistakes in matches without losing their place
  • Express concerns without negative consequences

When psychological safety exists, players are more creative, more willing to stretch themselves, and more honest about their development needs.

Building Connection

Know Your Players

Do you know what motivates each player? Their life outside hockey? Their hopes and concerns? Connection requires knowledge, and knowledge requires investment in getting to know people.

This doesn't mean becoming best friends. It means showing genuine interest, remembering what players tell you, and demonstrating that you see them as people, not just performers.

Listen More Than You Speak

Many coaches do too much telling. Connection-based coaching emphasises listening. When players speak, give them full attention. Ask follow-up questions. Reflect back what you've heard to show understanding.

Listening builds trust because it demonstrates respect. When players feel heard, they're more receptive to coaching.

Consistency and Reliability

Trust is built through consistent behaviour over time. If you say you'll do something, do it. If you have standards, apply them equally to everyone. Inconsistency destroys trust faster than almost anything else.

Appropriate Vulnerability

Coaches who admit mistakes, acknowledge what they don't know, and share their own development journey build stronger connections than those who project infallibility. Appropriate vulnerability models the openness you want from players.

Connection in Practice

Individual Check-Ins

Brief one-to-one conversations build connection over time. Not always about hockey - sometimes just "How are you?" delivered with genuine interest. These small interactions accumulate into strong relationships.

Personalised Feedback

Generic feedback shows you're not paying attention. Specific, personalised feedback shows you see the individual. "Good work" is less powerful than "I noticed you recovered really quickly after that turnover - that's the response we need."

Celebrating Progress

Connection-based coaches celebrate development, not just outcomes. The player who improves from poor to average has achieved as much as the player who was always excellent. Recognition should reflect effort and progress.

Managing Difficult Conversations

Strong connections make difficult conversations possible. When players trust you, they can hear hard truths. When they don't, the same truths are rejected as unfair criticism. Build the connection first; the honest feedback can follow.

Team-Level Application

Connection isn't just coach-to-player. Teams with strong player-to-player connections perform better. The coach's role includes creating conditions for these connections:

  • Team-building activities that build genuine relationships
  • Training structures that encourage collaboration
  • Addressing behaviours that damage team connection
  • Celebrating collective achievements

Common Barriers

"I don't have time": Connection doesn't require separate time - it's embedded in how you do everything. A two-minute conversation while setting up equipment still counts.

"It's soft": The evidence says otherwise. High-performance environments increasingly recognise that connection underpins performance, not detracts from it.

"Not all players want it": Different players need different levels and types of connection. Read what each individual needs and adjust accordingly.

Key Coaching Points

  • Psychological safety enables risk-taking and growth
  • Know your players as people, not just performers
  • Listen more, tell less
  • Be consistent and reliable
  • Personalise your interactions and feedback
  • Create conditions for player-to-player connection

Drills That Build Team Connection

VIEW ALL SMALL-SIDED GAMES

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans
different presses DRILLS
View All
Unfortunately there were no results for your search! Please try again
different presses ANSWERS
View All

Midfield positioning on 16yd hits and presses when using 4-4-2?

hi there I'm using 4-4-2 and on sometimes 3-1-4-2 with a lower level hockey team.I've chosen this over other formations, simply because the hockey experience and ability of my players is not of a high level (and most people have an approximate understanding of 442). Also, I believe that one must choose a formation based on players traits and what they can deliver. For example, I'd ideally prefer to have 3 forwards, to help with more height and width but then would have to either play 3 in the middle or 3 at the back... and my player strengths don't permit this. In short, I simply don't believe I have a strong enough CH / CM to handle 3 in the middle and I'm not convinced that the off-the-ball support from other players is strong enough to allow 3 in the middle. OFFENSIVE PLAYS Anyway, I'm not 100% where to get my centre mids to stand when we have a 16 yd hit to take (i.e. our possession). Obviously one of the CMs comes deep to offer a potential direct outlet from the centre backs or offer an overload option if the ball goes out to the sides (which is more likely, since I've pretty much banned the high risk play of releasing up the middle - we've had far too many turnovers in our final third or quarter because we tried to play up the middle). My players are 'aware' of posting up and leading runs. However, I'm not sure about the 2nd CM. On the one hand I'd ideally like the 2nd CM to come deep as well, in order to potentially help break up the opposition press but by doing so, I distort the midfield and if we do manage to get the ball to one of the CMs, he won't have the 2nd CM in a higher position to release to, etc. DEFENSIVE POSITIONING Can someone suggest, again, about midfield positioning using 4-4-2 or 3-1-4-2, when we are setting up a general press? I have traditionally encouraged man marking, simply because our general positional awareness is weak (which makes zonal play a no-no IMO) + our tracking and attitude to committed defending (i.e. you don’t give up if one tackle fails) could be better! However, looking at suggested presses on Sportplan, some zonal positioning seems a necessity and I think if I can help my players make the step, success will come because they've been forced to become more aware of their pitch positioning, etc. Also, looking at some of the presses, it looks like the midfield can go 'flat' to create a barrier... and as I encourage a diamond shape in midfield, I need to explain to my players what to do and when. Sorry for the wordy question. I hope this all makes sense. Regards, Gary

Gary Thompson Coach, England

Midfield positioning on 16yd h...

hi there I'm using 4-4-2 and on sometimes 3-1-4-2 with a lower level hockey team.I've chosen this over other formations, simply because the hockey experience and ability of my players is not of a high level (and most people have an approximate understanding of 442). Also, I believe that one must choose a formation based on players traits and what they can deliver. For example, I'd ideally prefer to have 3 forwards, to help with more height and width but then would have to either play 3 in the middle or 3 at the back... and my player strengths don't permit this. In short, I simply don't believe I have a strong enough CH / CM to handle 3 in the middle and I'm not convinced that the off-the-ball support from other players is strong enough to allow 3 in the middle. OFFENSIVE PLAYS Anyway, I'm not 100% where to get my centre mids to stand when we have a 16 yd hit to take (i.e. our possession). Obviously one of the CMs comes deep to offer a potential direct outlet from the centre backs or offer an overload option if the ball goes out to the sides (which is more likely, since I've pretty much banned the high risk play of releasing up the middle - we've had far too many turnovers in our final third or quarter because we tried to play up the middle). My players are 'aware' of posting up and leading runs. However, I'm not sure about the 2nd CM. On the one hand I'd ideally like the 2nd CM to come deep as well, in order to potentially help break up the opposition press but by doing so, I distort the midfield and if we do manage to get the ball to one of the CMs, he won't have the 2nd CM in a higher position to release to, etc. DEFENSIVE POSITIONING Can someone suggest, again, about midfield positioning using 4-4-2 or 3-1-4-2, when we are setting up a general press? I have traditionally encouraged man marking, simply because our general positional awareness is weak (which makes zonal play a no-no IMO) + our tracking and attitude to committed defending (i.e. you don’t give up if one tackle fails) could be better! However, looking at suggested presses on Sportplan, some zonal positioning seems a necessity and I think if I can help my players make the step, success will come because they've been forced to become more aware of their pitch positioning, etc. Also, looking at some of the presses, it looks like the midfield can go 'flat' to create a barrier... and as I encourage a diamond shape in midfield, I need to explain to my players what to do and when. Sorry for the wordy question. I hope this all makes sense. Regards, Gary

Gary Thompson Coach, England

teaching presses on free hits ...

Hi allI am looking for advice on how to implement processes in my girls school hockey team. processes of setting up presses, defensive structures and counter attacking thinking. I have 14 players in the team from 15 years old to 18. we train twice a week. only a few play club hockey as well. We either play a 3-1-4-2 or a 3-1-3-3.I find it difficult for example, when you want to teach a press on the opposition 16, to simulate gameplay with only 14 players (if they are all at training). I can have my halves setup for taking the 16 and then get my strikers and links to setup, but then I still want defenders to see things from the back but they are taking the 16? Also when taking the 16 they then don't have any support in the drill because everyone else is setting up a press?I know we need to work on our basics in order for the other tactics and skills and game plans to work. However I find it frustrating with this team that on counter attacks for a few reasons which I am struggling to mend;- they only head forward. No one holds up the ball to wait for support.- they run straight and don't use angles- they pass too late and get tackled - they don't have the vision to see an early pass or pass into space- players without the ball do not run into useful positions and angles and get caught out by the person with the ball who then makes a pass to no one and it runs out of play.So suggestions please for;- open, creative but simple counter attacking- teaching processes for presses on free hits and 16s- coaching how to take 16s and work your way out- coaching vision and expecting your players to be in support. RegardsMatt

Matthew Lydall Coach, South Africa

Difference between full and ha...

Please can you explain the difference in the full court press press and the half court press

Carole Quill Coach, England

Outletting against a half cour...

overlapping outside halves ? or drop Midfield in hole?

Archived User Coach

Getting out of High Press | Sp...

What are the best things to get your players to do when you come up against a full press / 3/4 press, anything that's putting a lot of pressure on high up the pitch?

Simon Lowry Coach, Ireland

Roles and Responsibilty/Press ...

The two 'lessons' on formation, don't expand. they don't actually go into what the roles and responsibilities are.Also, a while ago Im sure that there was something on differnt types of 'press', FULL and HALF COURT....? Cant find them on the web site....Also don't quite understand being a paying member and the 'free' aspect of thge website, what do I get by paying, I am slightly confused.I do like the website, but it doesnt appear to be as good as it eas last season?Hope you can help me,Regards,Alistair

Archived User Coach

Full court, half court and 3/4...

Hi all, thank you for taking the time to read my question. I was hoping for some clarity around 'presses'Pressing oppositions 16- Full press3/4 pressHalf courtWhat are the pro's and cons offensively of each and in what situation would you suggest using each?

Joel Forrester Coach, England

What's the best way to teach c...

I'm looking for a simple and basic way to teach and encourage children to press. Asked using Sportplan Mobile App

Ryan Schutte Coach, South Africa

Clips or Animations/ Tactics D...

New to the site. Are the clips or animations you can download to show teams later? ie various presses or right hand side build up play etc? Playing out the back options?

Archived User Coach

left mid job in defending a hi...

what is the positioning and tips to no left them through the centre by heading to the lineand them cutting in

Rachel Sweetnam Coach, Northern Ireland

To man mark or zone? | Sportpl...

My Girls team I coach get caught a lot between man marking and zonal marking in the 23 yard area and sometimes end up with half the team doing one and the rest the other. Suggestions on the ideal defensive set up inside the 23?

Archived User Coach

How to coach school team with ...

Hi,I perhaps naively, expected to have most of our team from last year carry over and only have a few new comers to integrate and get up to speed with the rest. However meeting the team at our first practice last night i find I have five players still at school from last year and the rest all new comers, most of whom had not held a hockey stick at all till practice.This being only my second season coaching (year 9 to year 13 boys) has left me feeling a little blindsided, and feeling quite unsure how to prepare practices that target both groups of boys. Do i lump them both groups together, keep them separate? What drills/exercises to best bring the new comers up to speed.I don't want to neglect either group, keep practice worthwhile for the experienced boys, but also bringing the new comers up to a level were they can mix in with the others and learn organically from them while practicing as a team. David

David Smith Coach, New Zealand

How should my team react when ...

How should a women team,that cannot use the scoup or an overhead,do when the oposit uses a full press at a 16yd hit??Thank you...

Archived User Coach

Tactics for 8 a side junior ho...

What is the best way to position teams for 8 a side hockey?

Archived User Coach

Looking to play a 3-2-3-2-1 fo...

Have some questions about two inners. Also anyone running it. Do you like it?

Ed kolnaski Coach, United States of America

2:4:4:1system....how to play i...

Suggestions on how to play this system. I have very young 1st team so feel i must play defensive hockey. Thanks

Bev Koch Coach, South Africa

What should I do? Team Captain...

I have taken over a club as head coach this year and inherited a captain. She is a good player but is not my ideal captain and is used to communicating almost exclusively by email. I had a successful meeting setting objectives for the 1st team last weekend and following that meeting received lots of feedback for how well it was received. My captain yesterday sent a long email about her thoughts on the meeting and where we are and what the players should be doing in order to progress from her perspective. It is a long rambling email that I think has no objective or point to it that I think is completely inappropriate, now I know her heart is in the right place but this is really stepping on my toes as a coach as it is my place to do these type of emails. I am looking for advice on how I should be dealing with this, I am happy to pull her up but as she is very unconfident about herself I feel this might push her back into her shell even more and then she might do something daft like send another email apologising to the team! I am not sure if I should just ignore it as I wonder if it undermines me? Thoughts?

Ian Hardingham Coach, England

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans

Sportplan App

Give it a try - it's better in the app

YOUR SESSION IS STARTING SOON... Join the worlds largest hockey coaching resource for 1000+ drills and pro tools to make coaching easy.
LET'S DO IT