Field Hockey: overloading

Connection-Based Coaching has emerged as a significant movement in hockey coaching. The core idea is simple but powerful: the relationship between coach and player is the foundation upon which all development is built. Without trust, without genuine connection, coaching effectiveness is limited.

This isn't soft philosophy. Research consistently shows that athletes who feel psychologically safe, who trust their coach, who believe their coach genuinely cares about them, perform better and develop faster.

What is Psychological Safety?

Psychological safety is the belief that you can take risks without being punished or humiliated. In a hockey context, it means players who feel safe to:

  • Try new skills without fear of criticism for failure
  • Ask questions without being made to feel stupid
  • Offer ideas without being dismissed
  • Make mistakes in matches without losing their place
  • Express concerns without negative consequences

When psychological safety exists, players are more creative, more willing to stretch themselves, and more honest about their development needs.

Building Connection

Know Your Players

Do you know what motivates each player? Their life outside hockey? Their hopes and concerns? Connection requires knowledge, and knowledge requires investment in getting to know people.

This doesn't mean becoming best friends. It means showing genuine interest, remembering what players tell you, and demonstrating that you see them as people, not just performers.

Listen More Than You Speak

Many coaches do too much telling. Connection-based coaching emphasises listening. When players speak, give them full attention. Ask follow-up questions. Reflect back what you've heard to show understanding.

Listening builds trust because it demonstrates respect. When players feel heard, they're more receptive to coaching.

Consistency and Reliability

Trust is built through consistent behaviour over time. If you say you'll do something, do it. If you have standards, apply them equally to everyone. Inconsistency destroys trust faster than almost anything else.

Appropriate Vulnerability

Coaches who admit mistakes, acknowledge what they don't know, and share their own development journey build stronger connections than those who project infallibility. Appropriate vulnerability models the openness you want from players.

Connection in Practice

Individual Check-Ins

Brief one-to-one conversations build connection over time. Not always about hockey - sometimes just "How are you?" delivered with genuine interest. These small interactions accumulate into strong relationships.

Personalised Feedback

Generic feedback shows you're not paying attention. Specific, personalised feedback shows you see the individual. "Good work" is less powerful than "I noticed you recovered really quickly after that turnover - that's the response we need."

Celebrating Progress

Connection-based coaches celebrate development, not just outcomes. The player who improves from poor to average has achieved as much as the player who was always excellent. Recognition should reflect effort and progress.

Managing Difficult Conversations

Strong connections make difficult conversations possible. When players trust you, they can hear hard truths. When they don't, the same truths are rejected as unfair criticism. Build the connection first; the honest feedback can follow.

Team-Level Application

Connection isn't just coach-to-player. Teams with strong player-to-player connections perform better. The coach's role includes creating conditions for these connections:

  • Team-building activities that build genuine relationships
  • Training structures that encourage collaboration
  • Addressing behaviours that damage team connection
  • Celebrating collective achievements

Common Barriers

"I don't have time": Connection doesn't require separate time - it's embedded in how you do everything. A two-minute conversation while setting up equipment still counts.

"It's soft": The evidence says otherwise. High-performance environments increasingly recognise that connection underpins performance, not detracts from it.

"Not all players want it": Different players need different levels and types of connection. Read what each individual needs and adjust accordingly.

Key Coaching Points

  • Psychological safety enables risk-taking and growth
  • Know your players as people, not just performers
  • Listen more, tell less
  • Be consistent and reliable
  • Personalise your interactions and feedback
  • Create conditions for player-to-player connection

Drills That Build Team Connection

VIEW ALL SMALL-SIDED GAMES

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans
Unfortunately there were no results for your search! Please try again
overloading ANSWERS
View All

Best practices to train pitch movement and overloading without creating weaknesses in defence

What are the best practices in training players (female) to move as a team on the pitch, and to create overload for example, without weakening defence, especially on the axle of the field?

Sipko de Ruiter Coach, Netherlands

overloading in the circle?

how do you stop your team over crowding in the circle? what drills or game situations could i use at training?

Archived User Coach

Defending against 2 center halves

Hi can you help me setting a defence against a team playing 2 centre halves. My team plays conventional style 5321 . Thanks

MARK Coach, Australia

Alternate / complementary formation suggestions to 4-3-3?

Hi, last season after asking here, we played the 4-3-3 formation. We took the field in this formation and played the whole game this way. This worked really well for us last season, we got promoted and finished 3rd in our new grade. However we came unstuck in the semi finals where the team we were playing identified what we were doing and played the same formation against us in the second half, leaving us unable to make any inroads for the remainder of the game.Our team is from a small school, made up of year 7-13 boys playing against larger schools of year 9-13 boys, though i would guess we played against teams at the older end of the range. We can't match others teams in age & size or depth of experience yet, so we must play smarter.What are possible alternative formations and how would the team identify the need to switch between formations?David Smith

David Smith Coach, New Zealand

6 a side without a goalie formation

Would you say switching it around to a 1-2-3 would make for better attacking formations?

Coach, United Kingdom

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans

Sportplan App

Give it a try - it's better in the app

YOUR SESSION IS STARTING SOON... Join the worlds largest hockey coaching resource for 1000+ drills and pro tools to make coaching easy.
LET'S DO IT